Evaluation of Connor's research

My Evaluation:

• Connor's research is good because he goes into a lot of detail into all four categories: Mise-en-scene, camera, editing, and sound.
• However, I think that his research lacks a further level of analysis meaning that I don't have a lot of an implication into whether his analysed material would be useful for our own coursework.
• There are also some small grammatical errors which aren't major however it shows he did not proof read his work.
• I also think that his work shows that he has alot of technical knowledge about camera angles and editing which suggests to me that he will be good at the technical aspects of our coursework, whereas I probably won't be.